pm Enigmail, developer of the most popular extension in the world, Adblock Plus, is also an active participant for the Planet Mozilla blog community. The last few days, in response to Mozilla's new name and shame list plus the slow has Sirota investigating whether Mozilla's test methods are actually real.Rather surprisingly it turns out that Mozilla's number can be significantly wrong--and if they are wrong, the factors that Mozilla uses to tabulate a miscellaneous end result definitely should be made more transparent.
In the first set of tests show Mcdonald the FlashGot position in the top 10 is probably due to a bug in Mozilla's testing Setup, and that completion can perform very differently depending on which operating systems are tested on. In the second analysis can reveal an irregularity which Li does not seem to have an obvious cause--but it might be an i/o bottleneck on Mozilla's test computers. Basically, although performance testing on Read it later disabled due to a bug, still (slightly!) manages to record a 14% decline in Windows 7.
Li sum up both the analysis of public scolding Mozilla with performance data before its test methods was confirmed exactly. It seems definite that Mozilla has been more than a bit reckless, considering the importance of Firefox Add-on ecosystem. Tags: adblock plus, AdblockPlus, add-ins, extensions, addon, addons, apps, browser, extension, extensions, firefox, firefox 4, Firefox4, mozilla, performance, speed, testing, web, sailfish, WladimirPalant
没有评论:
发表评论